I'm sitting in the den staring at my primary ballot. It's still not filled out. I'm in such conflict over this primary vote. It doesn't look like Clinton is going to be able to win. I don't even know if I want her to win. I worry she is too set in the old ways, and won't pull us out of the idiocy of special interest lobbying and endless partisanship.
Still, Senator Clinton is a qualified candidate. Her tough talk on Iran and her bullshit fearmongering ads disappoint me greatly, but they aren't surprising. I think we should be prepared for similar tough talk from Obama when he wins the primary. If history is any kind of indicator, it's going to happen. Dems can't win acting like doves. Yes, I know, Obama says he wouldn't have voted to go to war with Iraq, but he wasn't Senator then and didn't have to cast a real vote.
So my conflict is this: How long will it be before we get another woman candidate who can make it this far? I've been waiting 35 years, and am concerned it may be 35 more. I really want to cast this first historic vote to assert my opinion that the guest list at the dinner party that is world politics needs serious overhaul. There's been too much testosterone for too long.
While I was noodling on this decision, I found some good stuff to share:
High Standards at The Washington Post Op-Ed Page
Candidate Quiz (the two candidates basically tied for me - Clinton got 57 points and Obama got 52 points)





Recent Comments